Jeong Moon vs Sonal Patil Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 09 Jun at 07:42 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Moon vs S. Patil

KOR
1
Win
Played
0
Win

IND
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Moon 1 - 0 Patil
They have played 2 sets in total, with Jeong Moon winning 2 and Sonal Patil winning 0. The last match between Jeong Moon and Sonal Patil was at the W15 Tashkent, 09-06-2025, Round: Q1, Surface: Hard, with Jeong Moon getting the victory 6-3 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Moon | 1 |
| Patil | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q1) W15 Tashkent(06-09-25)
J. Moon vs S. Patil H2H Profile
J. Moon vs S. Patil Match Preview:
- Second Serve Performance: In six months, Moon leads slightly, winning 39.71% of second serve points compared to Patil's 37.74%. Is this a decisive factor? It could be, given its correlation with match outcomes.
- Return Game: Moon again holds the edge, winning 48.61% of opponents' second serve points over Patil’s 47.31%. For first serve returns, Moon is at 38.17% while Patil is at 34.87%.
- Handling Pressure: Moon has saved 50.93% of breakpoints, surpassing Patil’s 39.16%. Could this indicate stronger performance in high-pressure moments? Likely so.
- Overall Matches: Patil's yearly win rate is 44.12% compared to Moon’s 40.91%. Does this slight advantage make a difference? It could in head-to-head predictions.
- Surface Preference: Patil excels on Clay with a 58% win rate, whereas Moon's strength lies on Hard courts with a 43% success rate.
- Competition Level: Both play mainly in $10K ITF events; Patil winning 45% and Moon 41.18% of their matches. Could this reflect on consistency? Likely.
- Opponent Quality: Moon faces slightly tougher opposition, with opponents ranked on average at 327.86, compared to Patil's 360.68.
- Deciding Set Performance: In tight matches, Patil wins 30% of deciding sets, while Moon claims victory in only 25%.
- Break Point Conversion: Patil converts more opportunities (37.65%) than Moon (35.82%). Does this signal greater efficiency? Yes, during crucial points.
Editorial Prediction (June 9, 2025, UTC):
Assessing both players' recent performances, Moon demonstrates a slight advantage in serving and return game stats, which are closely linked to overall match outcomes. This makes Moon a formidable competitor on paper.
However, Patil has a slightly better yearly win percentage and tends to perform better in the critical phases of matches, such as break point conversions and deciding sets.
While Moon faces higher-ranked opponents, indicating possibly stronger competition experience, Patil's strengths, especially his converting break points and deciding set performance, suggest a crucial edge.
Considering all aspects, Patil seems to hold a slight advantage and is likely to emerge victorious in the upcoming match.
Jeong Moon vs Sonal Patil Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. Moon vs S. Patil H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:48:51 | Average Match Time | 1:48:51 |
| 83% (59/71) | 1st Serve % | 62% (31/50) |
| 63% (37/59) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (18/31) |
| 42% (5/12) | 2nd Serve Win % | 21% (4/19) |
| 71% (5/7) | Break Pts Won % | 14% (1/7) |
| 56% (28/50) | Return Points Win % | 41% (29/71) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
J. Moon Recent Matches Played
S. Patil Recent Matches Played

J. Moon vs S. Patil Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 48.61% (35/37) | YTD Win/Loss | 47.14% (33/37) |
| 48.19% (80/86) | Sets Win/Loss | 48.13% (77/83) |
| 49.25% (788/812) | Games Win/Loss | 49.27% (742/764) |
| 50.00% (32/32) | Hard Win/Loss | 44.83% (26/32) |
| 33.33% (1/2) | Clay Win/Loss | 58.33% (7/5) |
| 40.00% (2/3) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.01 | Aces Per Game | 0.04 |
| 11 | Aces Total | 32 |
| 0.1 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.14 |
| 76 | Total Double Faults | 100 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:21:48 |
| 272.43 | Average Opponent Rank | 335.83 |
| 68% (1573/2313) | 1st Serve % | 64% (2265/3551) |
| 52% (811/1573) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (1295/2265) |
| 41% (305/740) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (585/1286) |
| 46% (141/307) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (180/395) |
| 47% (1089/2340) | Return Points Win % | 43% (1479/3401) |
| 46.43% (13/15) | Challenger W/L | 46.88% (15/17) |
| 50.00% (22/22) | Futures W/L | 47.37% (18/20) |
| 47% (33/70) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 47% (33/70) |
| 55% (6/11) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 44% (4/9) |
| 50% (12/24) | Deciding Set Win % | 45% (9/20) |
| 86% (35/30) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (33/28) |
| 14% (35/5) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (33/5) |
| 14% (37/5) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (37/5) |